《皇家共享小公主po周云》与其他记者调查电影的不同在于Me Too事件的本质其实一直以来世人皆知事实的真相早就不是秘密而一切的重点在于提供足够的论据因此本片的重点在于指控韦恩斯坦的女性“发声”这件事亦即本片标题的意义而发声这件事的无疑取决于音量的大小和社会的接受影片解决了前一个问题龙头媒体NYT成功地引发并汇聚了这些声音但这些声音是否能够起到效果这恐怕要社会接受等诸多因素也就是说:权力韦恩斯坦是一个合适的靶子他对权力的滥用早已臭名昭著而权势也正在丧失而针对于特朗普的、同样详实的指控则没有掀动大山这一经久的权力问题无法在这部平铺直叙的、不无俗套的电影里得到解决正如媒体的功能一样它只能hold the powerful accountable但真正的结构性问题恐怕力不从心了
Nostalgia for the 70s and 80s B-rated revenge films. The visual fetishes influence deeply how you "experience" the film and their expressive potential. Time is moving as are the visuals even if all objects are still in the frame. The action is completely raw, which makes it more impactful. It's a cult classic in the making.